Current:Home > reviewsUS appeals court dismisses motion challenging permits for natural gas pipeline -FinanceMind
US appeals court dismisses motion challenging permits for natural gas pipeline
View
Date:2025-04-16 14:37:03
CHARLESTON, W.Va. (AP) — A federal appeals court on Friday granted a motion to dismiss a challenge to construction permits for a controversial natural gas pipeline in Virginia and West Virginia after Congress mandated that the project move forward.
The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, sided with lawyers from Mountain Valley Pipeline in dismissing challenges to the project by environmental groups over concerns about the pipeline’s impact on endangered species, erosion and stream sedimentation.
The U.S. Supreme Court last month allowed construction to resume. Work had been blocked by the 4th Circuit, even after Congress ordered the project’s approval as part of the bipartisan bill to increase the debt ceiling. President Joe Biden signed the bill into law in June.
Lawyers for the pipeline argued before the appeals court two weeks ago that Congress was within its rights to strip the 4th Circuit from jurisdiction over the case. They also said that any debate over the law’s constitutionality should be heard not by the 4th Circuit but by an appellate court in Washington, because the law passed by Congress spells out that precise scenario.
“Armed with this new legislation enacted specifically in their favor, Respondents — the federal agencies and the Mountain Valley Pipeline — moved in this Court for the dismissal of the petitions,” appeals judge James Wynn wrote. “Upon consideration of the matters before us, we must grant Respondents’ motions to dismiss.”
Environmental groups have opposed the the $6.6 billion project, designed to meet growing energy demands in the South and Mid-Atlantic by transporting gas from the Marcellus and Utica fields in Pennsylvania and Ohio.
veryGood! (494)
Related
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- Fall in Love With Coach Outlet’s Valentine’s Day Drop Featuring Deals Up to 75% Off Bags & More
- Ravens vs. Texans highlights: Lamar Jackson leads Baltimore to AFC championship game
- A Hindu temple built atop a razed mosque in India is helping Modi boost his political standing
- Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
- FTC tied up in legal battle, postpones new rule protecting consumers from dealership scams
- Soldiers find workshop used to make drone bombs, grenade launchers and fake military uniforms in Mexico
- You Won’t Believe J.Crew’s Valentine’s Day Jewelry Deals, up to 60% off Select Styles
- Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed
- Amid tough reelection fight, San Francisco mayor declines to veto resolution she criticized on Gaza
Ranking
- Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed
- Econ Battle Zone: Disinflation Confrontation
- Why is Ravens TE Mark Andrews out vs. Texans? Latest on three-time Pro Bowler's injury status
- Do you know these famous Aquarius signs? 30 A-listers (and their birthdays)
- Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
- Documents say Fulton County DA Fani Willis was booked on flights bought by prosecutor with whom she's accused of having affair
- The enduring appeal of the 'Sex and the City' tutu
- Wall Street hits record high following a 2-year round trip scarred by inflation
Recommendation
IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
Ohio is poised to become the 2nd state to restrict gender-affirming care for adults
Nuggets hand Celtics their first loss in Boston this season after 20 straight home wins
Inside Kylie Jenner and Timothée Chalamet's Very Public Yet Private Romance
Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
Protests against Germany’s far right gain new momentum after report on meeting of extremists
Why is Ravens TE Mark Andrews out vs. Texans? Latest on three-time Pro Bowler's injury status
Grand jury seated Friday to consider criminal charges against officers in Uvalde school shooting