Current:Home > NewsFossil Fuel Subsidies Top $450 Billion Annually, Study Says -FinanceMind
Fossil Fuel Subsidies Top $450 Billion Annually, Study Says
View
Date:2025-04-16 23:45:29
The governments of the world’s 20 largest economies spend more than $450 billion annually subsidizing the fossil fuel industry, a new analysis has concluded, four times more than what they spend on renewable energy.
The report by Oil Change International, a Washington-based advocacy organization, and the Overseas Development Institute, a British research group, calculates the amount of money the G20 nations provide to oil, gas and coal companies through tax breaks, low cost loans and government investments. It comes just weeks before country representatives convene in Paris to forge a climate deal that aims to put the global energy economy on a path to zero emissions, and it underscores the obstacles this effort faces.
“If the G20 leaders want to be credible ahead of the Paris talks, they need to show they’re serious,” said Alex Doukas, a senior campaigner at OCI and one of the authors of the report. “Handing money to fossil fuel companies undermines their credibility.”
Doukas said phasing out subsidies should be a top priority because it hinders the transition to clean energy at the scale needed.
Researchers at Oil Change International tracked three main ways in which governments subsidize fossil fuel companies:
National subsidies: Direct spending by governments to build out fossil fuel infrastructure and tax exemptions for investments in drilling and mining.
State owned companies: Government-owned oil and gas companies that benefit from government involvement.
Public financing: Investments in fossil fuel production through government-backed banks and other financial institutions.
The subsidy data was collected from sources including government budgets and commercial databases. Doukas cautioned that some of the subsidies were not easily quantifiable and the figures in the report are likely underestimates. Still, the report gives a picture of the magnitude of the investments in fossil fuels, he said.
Countries vary in how they subsidize the fossil fuel industry. In China, for instance, a majority of the oil and gas companies are owned by the state and it invested more than $75 billion a year in 2013 and 2014 in fossil fuel production.
The vast majority of subsides to the industry in the U.S., on the other hand, are through tax breaks. The U.S. provided at least $20 billion a year in tax exemptions for fossil fuel companies in 2013 and 2014.
Scientists have warned that if the worst effects of climate change are to be avoided, global temperature rise must be kept under 2 degrees Celsius. In order to do that, researchers have estimated that we must keep at least three quarters of the global fossil fuel reserves in the ground.
“Exploration subsidies [in the U.S.] are particularly pernicious,” said Doukas. “At the very moment when we know we have to keep three-fourth of the fossil fuels in the ground, we’re using public money to incentivize their development.”
The Oil Change International’s analysis follows a report by the International Energy Agency this week that concluded that the world’s transition to a low-carbon energy is too slow. Low oil prices and an increasing reliance on coal in developing countries has impeded the growth in renewables, the agency found.
The IEA has also estimated that countries spent $121 billion in 2013 on renewable energy. That figure is about a quarter of the amount spent on fossil fuels in the G20 countries alone, according to the OCI-ODI analysis.
“Fossil fuel subsidies are public enemy number one for the growth of renewable energy,” Fatih Birol, head of the IEA, told the Guardian. “I don’t understand some countries—they have renewable energy programs and at the same time they have subsidies for fossil fuels. This is, in my view, myopic.”
veryGood! (672)
Related
- Mets have visions of grandeur, and a dynasty, with Juan Soto as major catalyst
- History of Racism Leaves Black Californians Most at Risk from Oil and Gas Drilling, New Research Shows
- This Texas Community Has Waited Decades for Running Water. Could Hydro-Panels Help?
- Dylan Sprouse Marries Barbara Palvin After 5 Years Together
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- RHONY's Bethenny Frankel and Jill Zarin Have Epic Reunion 13 Years After Feud
- Get the Know the New Real Housewives of New York City Cast
- A Status Check on All the Couples in the Sister Wives Universe
- Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
- A Composer’s Prayers for the Earth, and Humanity, in the Age of Climate Change
Ranking
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- Reneé Rapp and More Stars Who Have Left Their Fame-Making TV Series
- Carbon Removal Projects Leap Forward With New Offset Deal. Will They Actually Help the Climate?
- California, Battered by Atmospheric Rivers, Faces a Big Melt This Spring
- Meta donates $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund
- The EPA’s New ‘Technical Assistance Centers’ Are a Big Deal for Environmental Justice. Here’s Why
- Inside Climate News Staff Writers Liza Gross and Aydali Campa Recognized for Accountability Journalism
- The UN Wants the World Court to Address Nations’ Climate Obligations. Here’s What Could Happen Next
Recommendation
Scoot flight from Singapore to Wuhan turns back after 'technical issue' detected
An Agricultural Drought In East Africa Was Caused by Climate Change, Scientists Find
Ohio Environmentalists, Oil Companies Battle State Over Dumping of Fracking Wastewater
Chicago’s Little Village Residents Fight for Better City Oversight of Industrial Corridors
Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
New Research Shows Global Climate Benefits Of Protecting Nature, but It’s Not a Silver Bullet
Cities Stand to Win Big With the Inflation Reduction Act. How Do They Turn This Opportunity Into Results?
A US Non-Profit Aims to Reduce Emissions of a Super Climate Pollutant From Chemical Plants in China